Division 7A Just Changed:

What the Bendel Decision Means for You

Ryan Sheppard

Published February 27, 2025

by Ryan Sheppard

Social Share Widget

The Australian tax landscape has just experienced a major shake-up, thanks to the Full Federal Court’s ruling in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel. This decision directly challenges the ATO’s long-held position on unpaid present entitlements (UPEs) and Division 7A, delivering much-needed clarity for business owners, tax practitioners, and accountants.z

But what does this ruling really mean? And how could it impact your business, trust structures, and tax planning? Let’s break it down.


What Is Division 7A and Why Does It Matter?

Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 is a critical anti-avoidance provision that prevents private companies from distributing profits to shareholders (or their associates) in the form of loans to avoid tax.

For years, the ATO has argued that a UPE owed by a trust to a corporate beneficiary should be treated as a loan under Division 7A, meaning it could trigger a deemed dividend and additional tax obligations.

However, the Full Federal Court has now ruled against this interpretation, stating that a UPE is NOT a loan and is therefore not subject to Division 7A.

This is a major win for businesses and tax professionals, as it directly contradicts the ATO’s long-standing guidance.


The Key Takeaways from the Bendel Decision

Here’s what you need to know:

  1. The ATO’s Position Has Been Challenged: For years, the ATO treated UPEs as loans, arguing they should fall under Division 7A rules. The Full Federal Court unanimously rejected this, ruling that a UPE does not meet the legal definition of a loan.
  2. Less Tax Risk for Trusts and Corporate Beneficiaries: This decision reduces the immediate risk of deemed dividends for businesses with trust structures and corporate beneficiaries. It provides greater certainty for tax planning strategies.
  3. The ATO Has Limited Options Moving Forward


So, what happens next? The ATO could:

Appeal to the High Court – A tough battle, given the unanimous decision against them.
Push for legislative change – Possible, but politically challenging with an election on the horizon.
Accept the ruling and move on – Perhaps the most practical approach, relying on existing integrity measures instead.


What This Means for Business Owners & Tax Professionals

This ruling provides a more stable foundation for businesses relying on trust structures with corporate beneficiaries. However, uncertainty remains over whether the ATO will push for new legislative changes.


What You Should Do Now:

✔️ Review your trust and tax structures with a tax professional
✔️ Stay updated on any potential ATO appeals or legislative changes
✔️ Plan with confidence, knowing that for now, UPEs are not considered loans under Division 7A


Stay Ahead of Tax Law Changes

The Bendel decision is a game-changer, but tax laws and ATO interpretations can shift quickly. Make sure you’re always in the know.

📩 Subscribe to our newsletter for expert insights on tax rulings, ATO updates, and strategic business advice.

📅 Need tailored advice? Book a consultation to discuss how this ruling impacts your business